PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Stopping Jets offense


Status
Not open for further replies.
He has started 5 games, don't know how you could honestly say he is far ahead of him in such a limited time span.

Also I don't understand what you mean by his approach.

All reports are that he is an extremely dedicated worker, and has taken a leadership position within the team.
It doest take long to judge decision making. McCoy is solid, Sanchez is very weak in that area.
I dont know where you are getting the leadership reports, but it was clear in Hardknocks he struggled in that area. When a WR on your team publicly says he thinks the QB must have the TE on his fantasy team, and also says the QB hasnt earned the right to speak about his drops, thats not good leadership.
Sanchez seems immature to me and has shown many times that he is far too concerned with the medias opinions and the comments being made about him.
 
It all depends which Jets offense shows up. That unit has been a real Jeckyl and Hyde group. One second, they are awful and the next they are a pinball machine bouncing up and down the field with ease. The good news is that they rarely start well and the first quarter has been awful for them.

More good news is that Sanchez still makes bad throws. Unlike last year, these throws aren't costing them because defenders aren't picking off these passes as they did last year. Though since mid-October, he has been turning the ball over much more. In the last six games, he has 8 TDs vs. 8 INTs. For a team like the Pats who are second in the league in INTs, it is a good thing.

I think the Pats will stop or at least slow down the run. Tomlinson is old again and slowing losing carries. He has had over 4 YPC, more than 60 yards in a game, and only two total TDs since Minnesota in early October although he has been very effective at times in the passing game. Shonn Greene hasn't been any better (those playoff games last year look like a fluke) and isn't much a threat in the passing game.

I would put McCourty on Holmes. The Pats have to start considering having McCourty shadowing the best WR all game (Megatron was shutdown by him on Thursday, but looked like the player he is when he lined up against Arrington).

I don't know if pressuring Sanchez is the best idea. Many of his worst throws are when he has time to throw. The guy feels he has to make the play and will force balls to receivers. So it might be better to blanket his receivers and force Sanchez to make plays where there might not be any. That may mean extra people in coverage.

on the contrary , i dont think he can pick up the blitz effectively and scrambles as soon as he sees a hint of pressur.
 
on the contrary , i dont think he can pick up the blitz effectively and scrambles as soon as he sees a hint of pressur.

Well, I may be wrong. The thing is eventhough I have watched several Jets games, haven't watched Sanchez closely enough. He seems to want to force every play and refuses to throw away the ball very much even when he should. That is why I think blanketing the receivers is key. Maybe a mixture of both.
 
Last edited:
Well, I may be wrong. The thing is eventhough I have watched several Jets games, haven't watched Sanchez closely enough. He seems to want to force every play and refuses to throw away the ball very much even when he should. That is why I think blanketing the receivers is key. Maybe a mixture of both.
What I've seen is that he moves around when there is pressure and THEN forces the throw.
I think the best way to defend Sanchez is to use a disguised coverage that makes him think he has the deep ball. No matter the down and distance if he thinks the deep ball is there he will take it. The Jets WRs do not worry me on deep routes in the least, they are more dangerous with running after that catch.
I think BB will see this, and it will result in Sanchez chucking it up deep on 3rd and 4-7 or so.
 
A nice change-up from cover-2 (pre-snap) that may generate picks is to switch to 1-robber at the snap, because this gives the quarterback a MOFO look pre-snap, when the actual coverage is MOFC. 1-robber puts a safety (the robber) right in the hole the Pats typically leave open. The risk is that the corners are left one-on-one against their receivers on go routes.
 
Last edited:
It doest take long to judge decision making. McCoy is solid, Sanchez is very weak in that area.
I dont know where you are getting the leadership reports, but it was clear in Hardknocks he struggled in that area. When a WR on your team publicly says he thinks the QB must have the TE on his fantasy team, and also says the QB hasnt earned the right to speak about his drops, thats not good leadership.
Sanchez seems immature to me and has shown many times that he is far too concerned with the medias opinions and the comments being made about him.

Sorry but you can not honestly say one qb's decision making is better than another based on 5 games.

That's just ridiculous.

Sanchez has complete support of the locker room, one or two comments doesn't change that.
 
Sorry but you can not honestly say one qb's decision making is better than another based on 5 games.

That's just ridiculous.

Sanchez has complete support of the locker room, one or two comments doesn't change that.

How many days a week are you in that locker room?
 
How many days a week are you in that locker room?

How many days are you or AndyJohnson there?

I can only go with what I hear in the papers, and everything says that he is an extremely dedicated worker and has full support of the locker room.
 
How many days are you or AndyJohnson there?

I can only go with what I hear in the papers, and everything says that he is an extremely dedicated worker and has full support of the locker room.

Someone posted something that runs counter to that, but you dismissed it. You're not going by what you hear in the papers. You're going by what you accept from what you're hearing.

Big difference.
 
frankly pittsburgh was stubborn to keep running the same fire zone blitzes. give rex ryan credit in week 2. his blitzes were being picked apart in the first half and he switched to playing more coverage in the 2nd half and caused brady trouble something pittsburgh never did or will do because thats how they are. So pitt maybe a better overvall D but the jets matchup better vs the pats because they will play a lot of man-to-man press coverage on our WR so it will be a challenge to find people open.

Sorry, but Pitt was running plenty of zone coverage during their game with the Pats. In fact, when the media notices significantly less number of blitzes by a team known for its blitzing, you know that its a major change.

Also, the Jets may have matched up better against the Pats offense when Moss was here and when the TEs were still getting used to everything and Woodhead wasn't on the team, but I don't believe they match up nearly as well with the Offense the way it is now.
 
How many days are you or AndyJohnson there?

I can only go with what I hear in the papers, and everything says that he is an extremely dedicated worker and has full support of the locker room.

How's that "Body Language" fine system the team has set up for him reflected in your contention? Btw, the team whose lockerroom gives him their "full support" leaked that to the media.

Face it, when it comes to Sanchez, you are nervously whistling past the graveyard.

What you SHOULD be pointing out is that their WR/TE corps and OL is excellent. THAT is what gives the Jets a puncher's chance in this game- - - not the Don Knotts character they have taking the snaps.
 
Last edited:
Sorry but you can not honestly say one qb's decision making is better than another based on 5 games.

That's just ridiculous.

Sanchez has complete support of the locker room, one or two comments doesn't change that.

*ROFLMAO* Yes you can. In 5 games, you get a sample of at least 250 to 350 samples. That's 50-70 snaps for you math challenged.

Just because Sanchez has the support of the locker room doesn't mean it's complete. In fact, there is no way in hell you can say that unless you've interviewed, in private, every single person on the Jets team and coaching staff. And, I'd put money that you haven't talked to more than 5 people on the Jets.

So, please stop making your ridiculous exaggerated statements while trying to make yourself and Sanchez look good. All you actually accomplish is making yourself look like a fool.
 
Sorry but you can not honestly say one qb's decision making is better than another based on 5 games.

That's just ridiculous.

Sanchez has complete support of the locker room, one or two comments doesn't change that.
Sanchez has played more than 5 games, and it is very easy to judge his decision making at this point in his career.
McCoy started as a freshman in college. The Texas offense evolved from a rudimentary passing scheme with Young to one of the most complex passing games in all of college football under McCoy. McCoy completed almost 80% of his passes one season. Anyone who watches and has any clue about QB recogizes that decision making is a tremendous strength in McCoy. You dont need more than 4 years of college and 5 games in the NFL to confirm that. Unless of course you are a Mark Sanchez apologist looking for a reason to dismiss everything that doesnt put him in a positive light. At least until you can't and then you say its only his second year so that excuses whatever is left.
 
Sorry but you can not honestly say one qb's decision making is better than another based on 5 games.

That's just ridiculous.

Sanchez has complete support of the locker room, one or two comments doesn't change that.
How can one or two comments not change COMPLETE SUPPORT. Doesnt COMPLETE mean there would be zero?
Edwards clearly is not completely supportive based on his comments. So by complete do you mean some of his receivers? What about the body language fines? What about the Hardknocks issues that we all could see?
 
everything says that he is an extremely dedicated worker and has full support of the locker room.

2209225327_db7a2fe059.jpg


wave those green pom poms...:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:
 
How can one or two comments not change COMPLETE SUPPORT. Doesnt COMPLETE mean there would be zero?
Edwards clearly is not completely supportive based on his comments. So by complete do you mean some of his receivers? What about the body language fines? What about the Hardknocks issues that we all could see?

Sorry I really don't give to much weight to one comment from a diva WR who even then retracted his original criticism.

As far as the body language fines, again I do not really see the big deal. So he needs to approve his body language on the field, big deal. Eli pouts all the time, Brady cries for flags, the only thing that matters is leading the team to wins, something Sanchez has done numerous times this year.
 
Sorry I really don't give to much weight to one comment from a diva WR who even then retracted his original criticism.

As far as the body language fines, again I do not really see the big deal. So he needs to approve his body language on the field, big deal. Eli pouts all the time, Brady cries for flags, the only thing that matters is leading the team to wins, something Sanchez has done numerous times this year.


How can you expect people to take you seriously when you don't know the difference between approve and IMPROVE. Seriously. My niece who is 3 knows the difference between them.

BTW, EVERY QB calls for flags. Only people who are too stupid for their own good don't recognize that. You singling out Brady is pathetic. Also, neither Brady nor Eli have anything remotely close to "Body Language" fines that they have to worry about.

Seriously, you should just change your name to RUBE instead of Ruby. It's much more apropos for you.
 
How can you expect people to take you seriously when you don't know the difference between approve and IMPROVE. Seriously. My niece who is 3 knows the difference between them.

BTW, EVERY QB calls for flags. Only people who are too stupid for their own good don't recognize that. You singling out Brady is pathetic. Also, neither Brady nor Eli have anything remotely close to "Body Language" fines that they have to worry about.

Seriously, you should just change your name to RUBE instead of Ruby. It's much more apropos for you.

Clearly it was a typo, way to get worked up about nothing.

And yes, all QB's call for flags, although Brady does seem to do it more than others, but that is not the argument here. Even if all do, I was merely pointing out that all QB's have moments of "questionable body language". At the end of the day it holds no bearing whatsoever on their level of play.

And also, how can you end a question with a period instead of a question mark? ;)
 
Last edited:
What this all ultimately comes down to is Sanchez and the other 10 players on the field with him being coached by Schotty vs a defensive unit that while far from perfect still plays tough, opportunistically, and fast that is coached by the greatest defensive coach in history of the NFL. Belichick has been coaching his ass off this year, and he is consistently turning out gameplans that defeat their opponents. The Jets will get yards on gadget runs and breakdowns but that's it on the ground. Sanchez will be pinched into playing within the phonebooth and will be seeing increasingly polymorphic coverages that will both remove his primary and force him into mistakes.

I pride myself on trying to be as unbiased as a fanboy can get, but I don't see this one being close.
 
Sorry I really don't give to much weight to one comment from a diva WR who even then retracted his original criticism.

As far as the body language fines, again I do not really see the big deal. So he needs to approve his body language on the field, big deal. Eli pouts all the time, Brady cries for flags, the only thing that matters is leading the team to wins, something Sanchez has done numerous times this year.
So your definition of complete support is that he has some support you think but you choose to ignore the lack of support of the leading WR on the team, and you don't care that the team has decided it must alter his personality and actions, and even discipline and fine him for acting the way he does without it?
Yeah, good one.
And Charles Manson had the total support of the California population because who would take the opinions of a Diva DA seriously and being punished for murder, well big deal many other people have been too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Back
Top