Nate Solder sucks this year

RayClay said:

The quarterback got off a pass with nobody near him,

Is there a definition of "beaten" I don't know about?

Click to expand...

Apparently so. Then again, you think a guy without a sack yet this year, who beats his man and then turns down the easy sack to make a second move, has been an excellent pass rusher.

Deus Irae said:

Apparently so. Then again, you think a guy without a sack yet this year, who beats his man and then turns down the easy sack to make a second move, has been an excellent pass rusher.

Click to expand...

What? I thought you said Solder was beaten. backing off?

dreadful. i foolishly though solder was one of the better lt's in the league. boy was i wrong. more like of the worst at the moment. good thing we won't have to pay him.

He sucks. This is our year to suck. You can't do crap with out an offensive or defensive line. Nate sucks by the way...

He needs to be benched a full game. Every time there is a costly sack or penalty, always seems to be him.

No doubt Solder has been horrible this year, but the bigger problem, if that's possible, has been the interior line. I like what I saw out of Stork tonight though so I think he will be an improvement. Just no talent at the guard position or nobody ready to play yet, Cannon is obliviously better at tackle than guard. We better draft at least one, if not two offensive lineman in the first few rounds next year.

...................

he got beaten so badly on the strip sack.
it was disgraceful actually. vollmer was **** as well. where is that czech lineman that we had last year, Svitek?? give that guy a call. also send ritchie a invite so he can toughen these guys up.

He's starting to piss the hell out of me. He looks ****ing soft out there. Solder and that 2011 draft makes me want to vomit.

RayClay said:

What? I thought you said Solder was beaten. backing off?

Click to expand...

No, Ray. Multiple things can happen in a single play.



What the hell has happened to you? When did you go full Stepford? You used to know this stuff, just as you used to know that an OL could be beat without the need for a sack being surrendered to show it.