Recent content by dman91

As big as the Watson trade was, the amount the Chiefs got for a non QB is kind of crazy. Not sure anything can top that one.

Excited to see him work.

He can only help them in the passing game so I'm all for it.

This is interesting.. 3rd year of a rookie deal.

I think he was really productive with us but hes been so injury prone the last few years..All depends on the $$

I think the improvements on Defense could carry us to a top 15 finish but the QB spot is concerning.. both for this year and beyond especially with SF moving up.

Re: Strange but true: The last four Super Bowl winners...... Its not only that. Any team that has MADE the Superbowl has played the pats during the year 8 YEARS in a row... Streak would be 10 if you count the Superbowl as one of those games... (2003,2004)

Just imagine if they both finish first again next year and the Broncos have to travel here again next year. His head is gonna explode! :bricks:

The only thing our TEs are going to think about when they are lined up across from them is touchdown.

My ideal Day 2 for the Pats... Lots of Trading Down *ducks* Id like to see a way that the Pats can draft their CB/S in rd2, pick up a 2 next year and have the inevitable later round picks they like (3,4,a few later?) (Scenario: maybe trading 48 for a later 2nd and pick up a late 3rd/early...

Redskins also reportedly going after Royal (Lombardi says they want 3 new WRs).... Maybe Gaffney will be cut!

Re: Foxboro Informant: Josh running O, BB running D, "unbelievable" packages for Rave What about running play action with AH.. Putting some lethal running plays on tape so Balt knows of the threat so we can run PA out of those sets. I think it could be effective seeing as AH ran the ball...

Arizona 58 and 89 for 47.. hmm

Pats trade down via twitter

Close call on Faulk? 'It wasn't' - Extra Points - Boston.com Deal is reportedly 1 year with 1 mill base, 1 mill guaranteed, and 1 mill incentives. Welcome back #33