No, it doesn't make me feel better. My initial reply was just a simple statement of fact that Belichick won a playoff game in 1995. Nothing more. No insult included or intended. I was surprised that you even bothered to reply and that your note had a tone of being offended by a simple fact.
A sullen admission guilt after making a factually incorrect statement. Look, I don't defend Belichick's record without Brady, but what does it take to check an assertion (in this case of no playoff victories) on the internet? I guess according to your logic, one can lie freely about anything...
Makes me think of Dan Marino, one of the best pure passers the NFL has ever seen. He played for the coach who has the most career victories in the NFL, yet the two together never won a Super Bowl. Does Marino win multiple Super Bowls if he plays for Belichick?
Best available player is a concept that cannot be executed without reference to context. For most of Brady's twenty years, if the best available player (in the early rounds) was a quarterback when the Patriots came up to draft, it would have been idiotic to make that selection.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
