Search results

So, after now two days reflection, I have less clear thoughts on the matter. On the one hand, the "scientific" analysis done by the hired guns, Exponent, is flawed and easily debunked. I actually think the scientific evidence is still in our favor. The fact that they landed on this Exponent...

I'm relieved Felger dislikes Patsfans.com. Don't need that guy here.

Bring it on. Sooner they suspend him, the sooner he can appeal.

It makes no sense.

I think Bill said what he is going to say about the matter back in January, and I thought what he said was perfect.

It's time for them to really embrace what the NFL wants them to be, and be the bad guy. Fight back. This really has become the WWE after all.

I think those read as jokes. Jokes that actually support Brady's case that he was not aware of any wrong-doing, if it even existed.

I agree. But I'm just trying to shrink the parameter space in which Brady is actually guilty of something, which is what his goal should be now. He shouldn't hang his hat on the word of these two ball guys.

I think that's an extreme take on it DaBruinz, but I agree with the rest of your sentiment. It's still very possible to me that the Patriots did no wrongdoing. The science leaves that open, the report is not satisfying in this regard. If there is wrongdoing, it is still very possible that Brady...

So is the media ****show going to raze Salem State tonight? I'm glad there's not more pressing issues going on right now like serious problems with race in our country, or general global turmoil, I wouldn't want the press to miss it.

Question: Why is it so hard to believe that the two Patriots ball boys could've done something without Brady's awareness when the two communicated privately together quite frequently, and in one game unbeknownst to Brady the balls came out like rugby balls?

Question: If McNally threatened he wasn't going to "go to ESPN...yet" with what Wells presumes is some kind of wrong-doing on behalf of the Patriots, why wasn't four interviews enough to get him to throw somebody under the bus? Do they really think some sneakers and a jersey is going to do it?

The game you reference is the home game vs. the Jets. McNally would've been the last guy to touch the balls that game. Presumably, he's annoyed by Brady's standards on the balls. Unfortunately for the NFL, nowhere does anyone say that those standards are below 12.5. In fact, the bar is only set...

Well done Curran. Great stuff. It's well-documented Curran is probably the media guy closest to Brady. I am sure Brady is telling Curran he didn't do anything wrong, and Curran - like all of us who have a general sense of Brady after 15 years - is apt to believe him.

The other thing I don't understand is why the absence of texts between McNally and Jastremski where they talk about doing anything under 12.5 isn't considered evidence that McNally was simply targeting that PSI. Those guys clearly were willing to discuss anything via text, so why isn't there...

I think QM is merely posting an example of texting mid-game which he referenced earlier. I agree - there is only evidence of Brady wanting the balls at 12.5. There is no evidence of him wanting it under 12.5. There is also not any good evidence of the Patriots doing anything with the balls...

I like what Levine & Howe are doing - but I think it means more coming from Reiss. Levin & Howe are great, but are not nearly as high profile as Reiss.

For a guy makes himself more accountable than any other media member out there, that takes guts to lay it out there like that. All of his critical thinking is valid. Good work, Mike.

Yee should just put out his notes of the whole Brady interview. Let's get it all out there.

Fair. I actually have no problem with @oldrover starting the thread. Just wanted to make clear how little I weigh Skip Bayless opinion.