PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Computer Scientist Prove God Exists


patsfan13

Hall of Fame Poster
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
33,838
Reaction score
5,676
They did this by using a computer to prove Kurt Godel's God theorem.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/computer-scientists-prove-god-exists/story?id=20678984


Sorry can't cut and paste, from the article. Godel was a friend of Einstein and one of the most prominent mathematician of the 20th century.



https://www.ias.edu/people/godel

http://www.spiegel.de/international...ically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html

http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_ontological_proof

Good for Intelligent Design proponents and adherents to Natural Law, bad for Darwinist, marxist and atheist. Atheism is a non scientific belief. :D
 
They did this by using a computer to prove Kurt Godel's God theorem.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/computer-scientists-prove-god-exists/story?id=20678984


Sorry can't cut and paste, from the article. Godel was a friend of Einstein and one of the most prominent mathematician of the 20th century.



https://www.ias.edu/people/godel

http://www.spiegel.de/international...ically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html

http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_ontological_proof

Good for Intelligent Design proponents and adherents to Natural Law, bad for Darwinist, marxist and atheist. Atheism is a non scientific belief. :D
Seriously excellent links, but did you even read the articles? You comments would suggest that you didn't.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I did, I note a lot of the information was generated prior to the proof done by the computer. I also note that many are nervous about going public with promoting the notion of God publicly. I also feel that some would projection their notion OG God or a particular Religion onto the results onto the math involved as I did. :D
 
They did this by using a computer to prove Kurt Godel's God theorem.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/computer-scientists-prove-god-exists/story?id=20678984


Sorry can't cut and paste, from the article. Godel was a friend of Einstein and one of the most prominent mathematician of the 20th century.



https://www.ias.edu/people/godel

http://www.spiegel.de/international...ically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html

http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gödel's_ontological_proof

Good for Intelligent Design proponents and adherents to Natural Law, bad for Darwinist, marxist and atheist. Atheism is a non scientific belief. :D

"...the real news isn't about a Supreme Being, but rather what can now be achieved in scientific fields using superior technology..."

Of course atheism is a non-scientific belief. (fortunately, there aren't many -- if any -- atheists who believe that atheism should be taught as science)
 
Many atheist promote the ideas of a non intelligent strictly materialist view of the world, people who embrace Darwinist view, Marxist view his theories as scientific

https://www.marxists.org/archive/eastman/1935/science-philosophy.htm
Are you confusing Darwin's evolution and behaviorism theories with Social Darwinism? I've never seen anyone confuse science with Social Darwinism or Marxism. Atheism shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with science.
 
Are you confusing Darwin's evolution and behaviorism theories with Social Darwinism? I've never seen anyone confuse science with Social Darwinism or Marxism. Atheism shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with science.


You might want to check with Richard Dawkins on that. :D
 
You might want to check with Richard Dawkins on that. :D
A quick google search shows Dawkins views on evolutionary biology and behaviorism. I see nothing that links him with Social Darwinism. Are you sure you're not confusing them?
 
A quick google search shows Dawkins views on evolutionary biology and behaviorism. I see nothing that links him with Social Darwinism. Are you sure you're not confusing them?


I am not addressing Social Darwinism issue. That is you supposition not mine.
 
You're mixing together several points of view. They may overlap but they are not "atheism" nor are they limited to atheists.

Marxism, for example, is not atheism.


Yes I am.

Marxism is explicitly atheist. According to Marx.
 
I am not addressing Social Darwinism issue. That is you supposition not mine.
The evolution of "super bacteria" has virtually proven the theory of natural selection. Studies on the behavior development of animals in urban settings has come pretty close to proving behaviorism. Unless you really were confusing them with Social Darwinism, your point is invalid.
 
Last edited:


MORSE: Did Rookie De-Facto GM Eliot Wolf Drop the Ball? – Players I Like On Day 3
MORSE: Patriots Day 2 Draft Opinions
Patriots Wallace “Extremely Confident” He Can Be Team’s Left Tackle
It’s Already Maye Day For The Patriots
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots OL Caedan Wallace Press Conference
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Day Two Draft Press Conference
Patriots Take Offensive Lineman Wallace with #68 Overall Pick
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Receiver Ja’Lynn Polk’s Conference Call
Patriots Grab Their First WR of the 2024 Draft, Snag Washington’s Polk
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
Back
Top