Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Maroney missed two games because of injury in 2006, and he's missed three games this year. I'd give him a little more time before I'd consider him injury prone. When healthy Maroney has done well (with the carries they've given him). In 2006 he averaged 4.3 ypc, added up 745yds behind Dillon, and 783yrds on Kick returns. So far this season he's averaged 4.7ypc, and he's only had two games with under a 5 ypc avg.
While Maroney doesn't get a lot of looks as a receiver, he can catch the ball just fine. Did you watch the Redskins game? The Patriots don't use Maroney in that role more because they have Faulk. I'd like to see NE give Laurence more looks as a receiver though.
I could understand your saying he's missed some games with injury, so you'd like to see him stay healthy before placing your trust in him, but I'm kind of surprised at wanting to replace him.
Let's not let McFadden's being among a lot of peoples binkies cloud our vision. Saying NE should draft McFadden would be overlooking the fact that NE doesn't need him, and they have bigger issues. I mean, it's not like Maroney, Morris, and Faulk will all likely be on the 2008 roster, and it's not like there's going to be a bunch of good RB's in the 2008 draft class, right? I'd much rather see NE drop down a few spots and draft someone like Kenny Phillips, then use a second, third, or fourth on a RB to develope as either Morris or Faulk's replacement.
People talk about Maroney running to upright, and his injury problems. McFadden is the definition of an upright runner. Also, he's built somewhat like a WR, and he's kind of top heavy. What do I mean by that? His upper body is long and developed, while his lower body should be more developed (thicker) for his size and position. I'm not saying the guy is going to be a bust, as I've been impressed with some of his college performances, but don't for a second think there aren't question marks concerning his ability to transfer his game to the NFL.
Another thing to think about is the fame McFadden has already gained, and how that would effect his contract demands if selected 3rd, 4th, or 5th overall. I'd be willing to bet Darren's agent (especially with the succes of Paterson) is going to try and break the bank of whom ever drafts him, and NE's not about to fork over that kind of cash to a RB, especially with one first round contract (late first) already at the position.
Finally, let's talk about how everyone is comparing McFadden to Adrian Peterson. I can see some of the comparison when it comes to running styles, and some of the other aspects of their games, but they're different runners. Peterson has a stronger lower body, more of an overall RB's build, and he's a tougher runner. When I say tougher, I mean he breaks more tackles, and is harder to take down. So, I wouldn't so quickly take Peterson's success as indication that McFadden will have that same level of success.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebman2112
Maroney missed two games because of injury in 2006, and he's missed three games this year. I'd give him a little more time before I'd consider him injury prone. When healthy Maroney has done well (with the carries they've given him). In 2006 he averaged 4.3 ypc, added up 745yds behind Dillon, and 783yrds on Kick returns. So far this season he's averaged 4.7ypc, and he's only had two games with under a 5 ypc avg.
While Maroney doesn't get a lot of looks as a receiver, he can catch the ball just fine. Did you watch the Redskins game? The Patriots don't use Maroney in that role more because they have Faulk. I'd like to see NE give Laurence more looks as a receiver though.
I could understand your saying he's missed some games with injury, so you'd like to see him stay healthy before placing your trust in him, but I'm kind of surprised at wanting to replace him.
Let's not let McFadden's being among a lot of peoples binkies cloud our vision. Saying NE should draft McFadden would be overlooking the fact that NE doesn't need him, and they have bigger issues. I mean, it's not like Maroney, Morris, and Faulk will all likely be on the 2008 roster, and it's not like there's going to be a bunch of good RB's in the 2008 draft class, right? I'd much rather see NE drop down a few spots and draft someone like Kenny Phillips, then use a second, third, or fourth on a RB to develope as either Morris or Faulk's replacement.
People talk about Maroney running to upright, and his injury problems. McFadden is the definition of an upright runner. Also, he's built somewhat like a WR, and he's kind of top heavy. What do I mean by that? His upper body is long and developed, while his lower body should be more developed (thicker) for his size and position. I'm not saying the guy is going to be a bust, as I've been impressed with some of his college performances, but don't for a second think there aren't question marks concerning his ability to transfer his game to the NFL.
Another thing to think about is the fame McFadden has already gained, and how that would effect his contract demands if selected 3rd, 4th, or 5th overall. I'd be willing to bet Darren's agent (especially with the succes of Paterson) is going to try and break the bank of whom ever drafts him, and NE's not about to fork over that kind of cash to a RB, especially with one first round contract (late first) already at the position.
Finally, let's talk about how everyone is comparing McFadden to Adrian Peterson. I can see some of the comparison when it comes to running styles, and some of the other aspects of their games, but they're different runners. Peterson has a stronger lower body, more of an overall RB's build, and he's a tougher runner. When I say tougher, I mean he breaks more tackles, and is harder to take down. So, I wouldn't so quickly take Peterson's success as indication that McFadden will have that same level of success.
BB does not draft for need. He takes the best value. If thats a trade he makes the trade. If its for picks he takes the picks. Etc etc.
Maroney is not a bust. Maroney is a injury machine.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by danny88
BB does not draft for need. He takes the best value.
Pardon me, but this is one of my pet peeves. BB absolutely drafts for need! When has he ever used a 1st or 2nd on a guy who wouldn't be counted on to start by his 2nd season? On the rare occasion that there's a hole in the starting lineup -- e.g. LG in 2005 -- he drafts to that position. You just might not notice it because he carefully tries to avoid leaving those obvious holes, thus giving the team more flexibility on draft day.
You cannot talk about "value" independent of need. Brady Quinn would have been a "value" pick for a lot of teams at #24 last year, but not for the Patriots.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
I'm hoping McFadden is on the board when we draft so we can trade down. This draft lacks the pure #1 overall so it might be better if we're drafting 4th or 5th.
Currently we would be picking 4th with Miami, St Louis and the Jets ahead of us. I don't see any of them drafting McFadden although I suppose the Jets could. Hopefully a couple of teams after us fall in love with him and we can trade down.
Petersen getting hurt sucks I was hoping he would run for 2k to drive up McFadden's value. I know they're a different style of back but this is a copy cat league and his success would lead others to drafting a back high.
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."
There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
Pardon me, but this is one of my pet peeves. BB absolutely drafts for need! When has he ever used a 1st or 2nd on a guy who wouldn't be counted on to start by his 2nd season? On the rare occasion that there's a hole in the starting lineup -- e.g. LG in 2005 -- he drafts to that position. You just might not notice it because he carefully tries to avoid leaving those obvious holes, thus giving the team more flexibility on draft day.
You cannot talk about "value" independent of need. Brady Quinn would have been a "value" pick for a lot of teams at #24 last year, but not for the Patriots.
Amen. The Patriots are looking for value in their system. Right now, no QB is worth a first-round pick to the Pats; in fact, I'm not really sure any player available right now would be worth what a top-five pick would cost.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
in fact, I'm not really sure any player available right now would be worth what a top-five pick would cost.
And that's the thing. If the Pats can't trade back, what do they do? I refuse to believe that a safety or a WR is worth a top 5 pick to the Patriots. It has been mentioned that Son of Howie and McFadden are unlikely because of the use of cap dollars. Ditto QB. There's no CB on the board that merits a top 5 pick (and I'm going to say top 3...because I don't think the 49ers are going to win again).
I think the direction to go is to get Jake Long, even if it requires moving up a spot or two.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
Pardon me, but this is one of my pet peeves. BB absolutely drafts for need! When has he ever used a 1st or 2nd on a guy who wouldn't be counted on to start by his 2nd season? On the rare occasion that there's a hole in the starting lineup -- e.g. LG in 2005 -- he drafts to that position. You just might not notice it because he carefully tries to avoid leaving those obvious holes, thus giving the team more flexibility on draft day.
You cannot talk about "value" independent of need. Brady Quinn would have been a "value" pick for a lot of teams at #24 last year, but not for the Patriots.
If bb drafted on need alone he would have drafted a lb last year. He takes best player available on HIS board. My point was bb will not draft a player higher then he should since the pats need help at the position.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by dryheat44
And that's the thing. If the Pats can't trade back, what do they do? I refuse to believe that a safety or a WR is worth a top 5 pick to the Patriots. It has been mentioned that Son of Howie and McFadden are unlikely because of the use of cap dollars. Ditto QB. There's no CB on the board that merits a top 5 pick (and I'm going to say top 3...because I don't think the 49ers are going to win again).
I think the direction to go is to get Jake Long, even if it requires moving up a spot or two.
I would agree with you dryheat. The only thing that I would point out is that a high draft pick is signed for 6 years. Sey I believe only has three years on his contract. Ditto with Maroney.
The cream of the crop production of a top 5 pick should be the last three years of his six year contract (assuming he gets better each year.) So if BB decides in the longterm to replace Sey with Son of Howie, with Sey beinging the mentor for three years. I could see that.
__________________
According to Rodney Harrison, new wide-receiver Wes Welker was “a pain in the butt” to deal with when he was with the Dolphins. “We had to double-team him because no one could stick with him man-to-man,” Harrison said.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTS-80
I would agree with you dryheat. The only thing that I would point out is that a high draft pick is signed for 6 years. Sey I believe only has three years on his contract. Ditto with Maroney.
The cream of the crop production of a top 5 pick should be the last three years of his six year contract (assuming he gets better each year.) So if BB decides in the longterm to replace Sey with Son of Howie, with Sey beinging the mentor for three years. I could see that.
Chris Long is a nice story but I don't think he is worth a top 5 pick, he has experience in the 3-4 but is at least 20 pounds lighter than our starting DEs. Smells like a better version of Klecko to me.
The locks appear to be Jake Long (OT), Dorsey (DT) and then maybe McFadden. After that is it a crap shoot. It would be nice if a couple of the QBs would actually start to play some decent football.
As far as McFadden goes, the reason he would be picked is because he improves the team* . <---- period
Maroney would slide into a reserve role or be cut / traded, it is nothing personal. Maroney's cap numbers.are managable, I would keep him, you can never have too much depth at RB (or any other position).
Cap numbers, next 3 years.
Maroney, Laurence 1,634,220 1,774,220 2,009,220 UFA
*Standard disclaimer, I would trade down. Top B+ players are better and more affordable than an A player.
Re: For Those Advocating The Selection of Darren McFadden
Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17
Chris Long is a nice story but I don't think he is worth a top 5 pick, he has experience in the 3-4 but is at least 20 pounds lighter than our starting DEs. Smells like a better version of Klecko to me.
The locks appear to be Jake Long (OT), Dorsey (DT) and then maybe McFadden. After that is it a crap shoot. It would be nice if a couple of the QBs would actually start to play some decent football.
As far as McFadden goes, the reason he would be picked is because he improves the team* . <---- period
.
I agree that McFadden would improve the team. He just has to be better than Kyle Eckel for that to be true. There are a lot of QBs out there that improve the team over Matt Guttierez, but I wouldn't draft one on the first day. God knows that punter could be improved. Depth guys on the OL could be improved.
"Improving the team" though, seems to be not enough a reason for spending a top 5 pick on McFadden.
I also think many of us are forgetting how great Maroney was at UM. I think McFadden is the best RB in the draft, but I'm not 100% that he'll be a better pro than Maroney, whom I thought was the best RB in the draft two years ago.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee