RayClay
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2005
- Messages
- 26,958
- Reaction score
- 9,712
So, everyone is OK with losing Revis and McCourty as long as we don't hurt our ability to pay people in 3-4 years?
I disagree with ever doing that and have vehemently defended the Patriots and other teams never doing that. I think I've posted that over and over.
However, do we want to risk losing Revis, McCourty and more, as super bowl players demand big contracts, so we can be a decent team (poor interior line without Wilfork, Average secondary) now and a decent team with eirther an old, or untested QB later?
BB is always doing things he would never do (drafting linebackers, picking up Moss, then laying huge numbers in anticipation of a multi year contract for Revis).
BB majored in economics. Economics is situational, not constant. A fit and athletic tom Brady is the rarest commodity of all, and a real chance at winning multiple super bowls is too.
Because that method hasn't worked.
I get the concept, but no team has ever used it effectively.
I disagree with ever doing that and have vehemently defended the Patriots and other teams never doing that. I think I've posted that over and over.
However, do we want to risk losing Revis, McCourty and more, as super bowl players demand big contracts, so we can be a decent team (poor interior line without Wilfork, Average secondary) now and a decent team with eirther an old, or untested QB later?
BB is always doing things he would never do (drafting linebackers, picking up Moss, then laying huge numbers in anticipation of a multi year contract for Revis).
BB majored in economics. Economics is situational, not constant. A fit and athletic tom Brady is the rarest commodity of all, and a real chance at winning multiple super bowls is too.