JohnJH
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2023
- Messages
- 841
- Reaction score
- 962
I'm not going to loose any sleep over it..
Couldn't find change?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm not going to loose any sleep over it..
Couldn't find change?
Gibson could end up being a really impact player for us. And, he's much younger.Ekeler was an upgrade from Gibson in their mind. So we got the Commanders sloppy second.
Was going to say that. Ekeler has had a string of ankle injuries. Hasn’t been the same.I will say, there is a sense Ekeler hit a steep decline last year.
We may definitely see these two deals differently a year from now
I think the Pats have been conditioned for 20+ years that you win by not splashing money on few guys that they don't know anything else.Money speaks and based off Patriots history we’ve never been generous with contract offers. I think you offer guys a good deal and they’ll sign regardless of the rebuild.
If we operate with the idea that we need to get players to sign great value contracts as a losing franchise we won’t get anywhere.
I don’t think anyone is saying that Ekeler > Stevenson, but Ekeler > Gibson. Whether that would’ve been worth it money wise is another question.Because for 6 mil a year they have Stevenson and Gibson. Ekeler is not some major upgrade over Stevenson. Definitely not at double his salary.
View attachment 56972
Can he go 5 seconds without looking like a babbling idiot. He’s always wrongAnyone got a status update on Zolak’s “fireworks”?
Anyone got a status update on Zolak’s “fireworks”?
Right but Gibson + Ekeler at 6 million vs Ekeler at 6 million. Gibsons receiving stats are on point with Ekeler' I think it was a solid strategic move. Keep your guy and bring in a complimentary back that upgrades the passing game.I don’t think anyone is saying that Ekeler > Stevenson, but Ekeler > Gibson.
That backup RB is dynamite.Anyone got a status update on Zolak’s “fireworks”?
This may sound silly but I have had Antonio Gibson on my fantasy football team two years in a row and thus watched chunks of Commanders games (ugh) because of it. The guy was honestly not much of a factor for their offense at all based on what I saw.Gibson could end up being a really impact player for us. And, he's much younger.
Agreed. Anyone crying about Washed Austin ****ing Eckler is just looking to cry for crying's sake.Right but Gibson + Ekeler at 6 million vs Ekeler at 6 million. Gibsons receiving stats are on point with Ekeler' I think it was a solid strategic move. Keep your guy and bring in a complimentary back that upgrades the passing game.
I like Ekeler but I think the RB position is more than solid with Gibson and Stevenson. At the same cost of Ekeler.
I like Zolak..with that said I found 'em..here ya go.Anyone got a status update on Zolak’s “fireworks”?
hopefully it means they see Mapu as a linebacker and ready for the snaps.With our cap space Outbid was a word I did not want to hear today. Especially on a deal like this.