- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 8,846
- Reaction score
- 33,846
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Whatever the reason, it is impossible to have a discussion when I have no clue what you are trying to say. Is that so difficult for you to understand?I made a point…..you’re the moron who failed at comprehension.
No thanks.
Your idiocy is notedWhatever the reason, it is impossible to have a discussion when I have no clue what you are trying to say. Is that so difficult for you to understand?
I said players wouldn’t come here to play with a bad qb. You said Tom Brady.
So either you think players don’t want to play with Tom Brady or just more want to play with Newton.
Both are wrong but you were not close to clear about the point you were trying to make.
it would appear you did so in order to be able to hurl insults. Your childishness is noted.
Plus, this "newly released" study has not been peer-reviewed (where the science is reviewed, fact checked, and vetted by leading experts in the field) which is required for publication in any reputable journal. I agree that it would almost surely be rejected as written in a reputable peer-reviewed journal.The study suffers from clear differences in the vaccinated vs. natural immunity group, including comorbities (not controlled for but acknowledged) and only controlling for age, gender and region. This leads the composition of groups being quite different (as noted above urban areas and ultraorthadox groups). It's very easy with this kind of observational study to draw dramatic conclusions that are in fact false. Although the limitations are acknowledged, the conclusions are stated far more confidently than they should be. Doubt it stands as printed if submitted to a reputable journal. Other studies do not point to natural immunity as superior to vaccines.
I saw one where he said to not feel sorry for him. I didnt feel sorry for him, so I did not know how to take it.Any posts from the Cam accounts yet?
Exciting. Baptized by fire…or is it just the sweltering Florida heat?..
Exciting. Baptized by fire…or is it just the sweltering Florida heat?..
They were 6th in scoring defenseMeh.. Fins were in the middle of the pack in both pass and run D.
Everyone is pumping the 'Fins tires all the sudden.Meh.. Fins were in the middle of the pack in both pass and run D.
10 of their 16 games were vs teams 18th or worse in scoring offense.They were 6th in scoring defense
Yup. Takes the fun out of the experience and a big part of why I'm here so seldom these days. I step in once in a while for bigger news — like Cam today — and ... this thread. Yeah you can try to ignore those posts but at some point it's tiresome skimming for anything else.I guess we need more mods here @Ian
i understand people talking bout the vax as it relates directly to Cam, but it’s ridiculous how so many scientists come out to debate studies and offer their expert-opinions in so many threads. It is impossible to ignore and it is ruining the board. I can’t read any more tonight, which sucks because this is a big day.
Yeah, this is nothing compared to another board though. Trust me, its better here than in most places.Yup. Takes the fun out of the experience and a big part of why I'm here so seldom these days. I step in once in a while for bigger news — like Cam today — and ... this thread. Yeah you can try to ignore those posts but at some point it's tiresome skimming for anything else.
I mean I can probably say that about most teams of who they played. There are only 5 teams that are top 5, and usually you dont play all of them.10 of their 16 games were vs teams 18th or worse in scoring offense.
Their D is very average.
Do your homework.