PScottman
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 3,458
- Reaction score
- 4,780
If those were all one year signings I think you could make that claim. Most are multiple year contracts and there remains a rule that a certain percentage of the cap must be utilized across every league year.If it was a rebuild year, the pats do not spend 160 mil in the offseason. Thats a go all in to win year.
If "win" was defined as fringe playoff team? I suppose maybe if EVERY other variable turned in the Pats favor including a rookie QB's abilities, injuries, every signing paying off as projected "on paper", etc but that isn't realistic either.
If "win" was defined as anything better than that such as AFCCG or better? C'mon. They wouldn't have traded Michel nor Gilmore either in that context. There wouldn't have been ANY looking toward the future transactions.
EDIT: And add in the context of owners don't want a huge exodus of fans - so they will expend some capital to appease those that see any moves as "trying to win".