Danger Zone
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,718
- Reaction score
- 4,544
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's possible that they think Mingo is ready for an expanded role in the passing game, maybe. He's a hell of an athlete, and maybe they figure disciplined, playing-within-his-role Mingo > freelancing Collins?
The defense has been a top NFL defense. Now, what that might say about the offenses the team's faced, and the other NFL defenses this year...
So both the Browns and the Patriots have used the phrase "for a conditional pick".
Neither used the word "compensatory".
I think, if Lombardi is correct, that he was freelancing and not taking coaching then it's a no-brainer that he had to go. If for nothing else than the message it sends.Certainly not this year. I think it's fair to say he was last year, but Hightower and Butler have both played at a much higher level than Collins has this season. Probably McCourty too, although he can be tough to observe watching the TV broadcast when he's playing deep so often.
Shredded is an overstatement, as is any claim that the defense has been good or has played to anything resembling expectations.
But, speaking of yesterday, I do think the Pats' D played a pretty iffy game considering they were going against a Bills offense that was missing McCoy, Watkins, and Goodwin with Woods playing far below 100%.
Isn't that kind of the point, though? If the defense has achieved a good PPG stat by playing a bunch of bad offenses, then PPG should be taken with a grain of salt and not seen as representative of their actual level of play relative to other defenses. We're 18th in DVOA right now.
It has to be conditional since the Browns haven't been awarded the pick in question yet. What I've been hearing is that it's a compensatory 3rd that becomes a 4th if the Browns don't don't get a comp pick. Forget where I heard that, will dig it up and edit my post in a second.
Every year is the same thing, man "Oh we have so much Free space, we going hard". Every year. Sure, if you want to think we are going to change our M.O., then sure. Plus, which FA is going to replace Collins? I don't think there's going to be a player of his caliber, in his position, in Free Agency.
Mike Loyko @NEPD_Loyko 3m3 minutes ago
Per my Collins source: Collins turned down 11 million per year and recently got into a heated argument with Patricia recently
Here's what you seem to be forgetting:
Whether a team gets compensatory picks at all depends on whether they lose more relevant FAs than they sign. It does NOT depend upon the relative quality or cost of the players.
Player cost and quality only factor into the level(s) of picks, IF the team gets any picks at all.
That's the really bizarre part of the trade to me. I mean everyone is aware of the 4th rounder that we will lose because of #sciencegate so am not sure why this was acceptable.
This report, to some extent, implicitly contradicts Lombardi's overall claim(s) that Collins has been struggling this season and is a large reason for our struggles defensively, no?
Why would you offer a player 11 million per year if he was truly playing as poorly as Lombardi claims?
The offer may not have been recent - could be that he rejected the offer during the offseason. Could even be that the resulting issues with freelancing and attitude came about afterward as a direct result of this. Once Collins realized he was in his probably last year with the team (barring franchise tag), could be that he stopped buying in.
It's possible that they think Mingo is ready for an expanded role in the passing game, maybe. He's a hell of an athlete, and maybe they figure disciplined, playing-within-his-role Mingo > freelancing Collins?
Talent wise it will be hard to replace him (in pass plays) - especially with one body (and we can't play w 12 like we painfully discovered on Sunday) - but if this brings the D together and they can glue better than maybe it can happen. But if High goes down then its gonna be a lot of suffering.
Isn't that kind of the point, though? If the defense has achieved a good PPG stat by playing a bunch of bad offenses, then PPG should be taken with a grain of salt and not seen as representative of their actual level of play relative to other defenses. We're 18th in DVOA right now.
As far as other defenses go, there are quite a few extremely good defenses in the NFL this year, and we're definitely not one of them. Minnesota, Philly, Seattle and Denver are probably the cream of the crop on defense this year, and based on our D's play thus far we don't really belong in any kind of a conversation with them. Hopefully we can improve things going forward, but that was going to be a tough task even with Collins.
Also teams like Rams or Chargers (at least before they lost Verrett). Some solid D's but rare elite in this injury plagued first part of the season.
But BB is not comparing. He knows his players and coaches, he evaluates potential and envisions what he wants out of it .. and actually trusts his “eye test“ ..