- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 10,914
- Reaction score
- 19,251
Then, why even inject gender to the discussion?I didn't mean any of it from a gender standpoint.
Sounds like you're rationalizing rather than objecting to my characterization of the comments as being casual sexism.My comments were basically directed at the natural reaction guys tend to have when it comes to female hosts (which I've seen in here at various points).
It's sad some see it as a "natural reaction", just like casual racism was often characterized as such at one point in time.
There are plenty of females in the business who are top shelf. Mina Kimes, Lindsay Rhodes, Colleen Wolfe, Cynthia Frelund, just to name a few. Meghan isn't in their league at this point in time. Maybe she'll get better, or maybe she'll stay a sidekick to two clowns on a bottom tier sports radio talk station, who knows.
I don't think she's very good. She was on Tom Curran's podcast for a while, and IMO didn't add much. Maybe some day she'll develop a deeper sports acumen, but being a sidekick to the two other clowns on her show isn't likely to help, IMO.But I think she's exceptional and extremely intelligent, to the point where it makes Jones harder to listen to when he goes off the rails. My point, which I wrote about at various parts of that, was that she's the strength of that show, and the style between the two is so significantly different that Jones needs to figure out where he ultimately wants to go because the current approach just isn't working.
Glad to help, lol!On my point of how the outrageous stuff is what tends to garner the most interest, I literally see very little in terms of traffic from search on the hundreds of things that I've written about all offseason.
I write this, and noticed a spike and saw that this happened:
Just funny how that tends to go, and clearly, this falls under that category.