- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
- Messages
- 22,859
- Reaction score
- 42,909
/facepalm
We already have testimony from the sole witness of the incident and he told Peyton to come clean about what he did. Whitlock is an idiot who obviously has not read a word.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments./facepalm
well ,normally I NEVER peruse PFT but your link piqued my interest...and THIS is what I find halfway through your link
this is something a sub-moron with an ice pick stuck in his forebrain would fabricate in a meme
Hey guys did you know that Shaun King lied about being black therefore sexual assault and cover-up by Peyton Manning doesn't matter.
well ,normally I NEVER peruse PFT but your link piqued my interest...and THIS is what I find halfway through your link
this is something a sub-moron with an ice pick stuck in his forebrain would fabricate in a meme
well ,normally I NEVER peruse PFT but your link piqued my interest...and THIS is what I find halfway through your link
this is something a sub-moron with an ice pick stuck in his forebrain would fabricate in a meme
/facepalm
We already have testimony from the sole witness of the incident and he told Peyton to come clean about what he did. Whitlock is an idiot.
Shaun King @ShaunKing 18h18 hours ago
In his freshman year, Peyton Manning committed a MAJOR violation at the University. His attorneys forced it to be redacted in our documents.
Shaun King @ShaunKing 18h18 hours ago
Dr. Jamie Naughright was the one who caught Peyton Manning in this violation his freshman year. That's the ROOT of every problem they have.
Shaun King @ShaunKing 17h17 hours ago
I believe we will be able to release the redacted portion of the court documents as well. I've discovered what that was about. Deep & ugly.
LOL. Imagine if he took HGH in 1994. Goodell would probably s*** his pants.
I hear you bud, but it leads me to believe whoever's pulling the strings wants to draw it out and keep it in the media, i.e. the group with a suit against UTI'll admit the dude's good at generating clicks -- that actually has me curious, although string this story out like a daytime drama cliffhanger doesn't give me any more confidence in the messenger.
Yeah I was just kidding, don't think HGH was even a thing at the time, and colleges certainly weren't testing.I understand this is probably a joke, but if hgh was even available back then I can pretty much guarantee colleges didn't test for it.
Well I'm curious about her being barred from speaking about it. They signed a confidentiality agreement but clearly Peyton broke that agreement by publishing a book containing his account of the incident. Does that not render the agreement void?This is very reminiscent to me of OJ Simpson and Tiger Woods. For some reason, typical Americans want to ascribe character traits to celebrities and athletes, and while they know nothing about them, consider them models of virtue, integrity and all that is good.
Paying a sport well, seeming affable in interviews, and making tons of money to ACT in commercials are not evidence of character.
I suppose this will blow over quickly, since the victim is barred from speaking about it. Unless the redacted information is made public and its abominable, or this motivates some authority to dig deeper into the HGH issue, Manning will continue to acts as if he is on high ground, which has nothing to do with whether the truth would show he is or not. And many will react by blaming the vicitim(s), since the Peyton they know (from their TV) is a pillar of integrity.
Well I'm curious about her being barred from speaking about it. They signed a confidentiality agreement but clearly Peyton broke that agreement by publishing a book containing his account of the incident. Does that not render the agreement void?
Well I'm curious about her being barred from speaking about it. They signed a confidentiality agreement but clearly Peyton broke that agreement by publishing a book containing his account of the incident. Does that not render the agreement void?