- Joined
- May 18, 2015
- Messages
- 14,081
- Reaction score
- 19,592
She was severely bruised. If your best response is that there happened to not have been any broken bones, then that's pretty weak.I claimed she had no significant injuries. Broken bones, dislocated joints, lacerations, etc. the king of thing most people would expect if body slammed by a 275 pound man, and thrown about.
I asked "What makes you think she didn't have any significant injuries?" You replied "The police report, the testimony, and she declined any medical attention."I never made that claim. I questioned your certainty.
So now that I've quoted the police report and the arrest record, I'll ask again: What part of the police report or courtroom testimony led you to believe she didn't have any significant injuries?
I mean, really. Is this all you have? She didn't have any broken bones, therefore no assault occurred?
My belief is based on the police report and the fact that in the one trial he had, Hardy was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.I'm not claiming to know what happened. I'm pointing out that your belief is entirely based off her account.
I understand people affording the accused the presumption of being innocent until proven guilty. You seem completely unaware that in the one trial he had in a criminal court of law, Hardy was indeed found guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
Uh, yes they did, and those injuries are listed in the police report.Her account is that he lifted her up and body slammed her and also threw her into the tub. The police didn't find significant injuries,
Sorry, but comparing a guy who was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal court of law to the Brady deflategate fiasco is pure idiocy.You have her account, his account, his 911 call, and a dismissed trial. There's really no more evidence than there was against Moss, or Edelman for the same thing, or Brady for footballs.