Bostonian1962
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2004
- Messages
- 3,096
- Reaction score
- 34
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think Edelman should as well. He may not have been the most dynamic one or two rookie WR;s, but they list about ten, and I find it hard to fathom that he is not listed. No Vollmer?
This looks like a regurgitated list of first round draft pics.
I think Edelman should as well. He may not have been the most dynamic one or two rookie WR;s, but they list about ten, and I find it hard to fathom that he is not listed. No Vollmer?
This looks like a regurgitated list of first round draft pics.
I think it sums up the Pats drafting ability fairly well
Some absolutely God-awful list produced by no-one of note who have basically thrown the top 5 draft picks at each position on a piece of paper "sums up the Pats drafting ability fairley well".
I think that says much more about you, myself.
I spelled fairly correctly so your quote is wrong
I just meant the fact that the Pats had nobody on the board seems fitting. I don't care if it's an accurate list or not. If you made a thread with the picture of a pile of poop and said "first thing to come to your head" I would say the Pats drafting
I think it sums up the Pats drafting ability fairly well
The list has little to do with drafting ability, but a lot to do with how a rookie performs when he is on the field. If Welker went down week 1 and Edleman started the entire year he would probably be on this list. If Will Allen played the entire year Sean Smith wouldn't be on the list. Who knows? Maybe if Meriweather got hurt we would have seen Chung go to the pro-bowl. All you can expect out of a player is to do their job when they get the opportunity. That's why most people like to save their opinions of rookies until 3 years down the road.
I think it sums up the Pats drafting ability fairly well