- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 12,794
- Reaction score
- 22,886
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't think it's that bad...if everyone can remain healthy that is...This just looks like a mess.
???This just looks like a mess.
If this is the same Mark Ingram and David Johnson from 2016, sure. But it’s 2021 now.???
Health being equal, it looks like a potentially better RB group than what's in New England.
White's not the same White from 2016, either, Lindsay's probably the best RB of the bunch, and Burkhead is the best "versatile" back of the bunch, when he's healthy.If this is the same Mark Ingram and David Johnson from 2016, sure. But it’s 2021 now.
The only RB I like here moving forward is Lindsay. And he has injury concerns of his own.
For the record, I’d take Harris over any of these guys currently. And I’d probably take Michel over any besides Lindsay. (Toss up between him and Johnson)
I don’t think it’s the RB group you think it is.IF they stay relatively healthy, that’s a nice/versatile crop of RBs.
But Burkhead hasn’t been healthy in so long, and his injuries have been bad. Plus is north of 30 now himself.White's not the same White from 2016, either, Lindsay's probably the best RB of the bunch, and Burkhead is the best "versatile" back of the bunch, when he's healthy.
Harris hasn't stayed healthy. Michel has had his health issues. etc...But Burkhead hasn’t been healthy in so long, and his injuries have been bad. Plus is north of 30 now himself.
Lindsay probably is the most proven for sure, but I’d like to see Harris this year. Think Harris might have a higher ceiling than Lindsay if given the chance.