Wevegotmossyouaintgotoss
On the Roster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Cassel and #23 for a #3 and a Third Rounder doesn't seem like enough to me...
As a minimum it's okay, I'd prefer a conditional 2010 pick that could be at least a third, preferably a second, based on performance.what do you view as good compensation. I see a 4th round as "good"
Seeing how we picked cassel with a very low draft pick, and vrabel was a steelers throw away that we scavenged, trading both of them away for the 3rd overall pick and a 3rd round pick is pretty awesome.
I can see how one might feel this way, but it doesn't really make sense. Brady was a 6th round pick, if you traded him straight up for a first rounder that would be a good deal by this logic --- and clearly that would be a ridiculously bad deal for us.
What I find odd is that Vrabel was already in KC today.. so this has had to been in the works for awhile.. I would assume. what do you guys think?
Well, IIRC, Vrabel never moved to New England; his family's still near Columbus.
As a minimum it's okay, I'd prefer a conditional 2010 pick that could be at least a third, preferably a second, based on performance.
Well, IIRC, Vrabel never moved to New England; his family's still near Columbus.
Seeing how we picked cassel with a very low draft pick, and vrabel was a steelers throw away that we scavenged, trading both of them away for the 3rd overall pick and a 3rd round pick is pretty awesome.
The fact they havent given the details of the pick does seem like something else may be in the works and from all accounts Foxboro is locked down and no one is talking ...
I wonder whether this may be something like Cassel+Vrabel for KC's 2nd and Gonzalez? Hence why we were happy to let Gaffney go? I just dont see Pioli dealing the 1st for Cassel and if I were BB id love to have the #34. Gives us so much leverage in what is a deep draft
Whatever if this doesnt happen today I dont think it happens at all ...
The fact they havent given the details of the pick does seem like something else may be in the works and from all accounts Foxboro is locked down and no one is talking ...
Why?? Is there a deadline or something?? I tend to think this was an under the radar move that someone leaked and MORE something that will be done in time rather than rushed now.. Don't see the big deal if it does not all come out today....The fact they havent given the details of the pick does seem like something else may be in the works and from all accounts Foxboro is locked down and no one is talking ...
I wonder whether this may be something like Cassel+Vrabel for KC's 2nd and Gonzalez? Hence why we were happy to let Gaffney go? I just dont see Pioli dealing the 1st for Cassel and if I were BB id love to have the #34. Gives us so much leverage in what is a deep draft
Whatever if this doesnt happen today I dont think it happens at all ...
Hence why we were happy to let Gaffney go?
I would think that somehow there must be more to this. If Cassel is involved in the trade whyisn't he in KC getting a physical (Yesterday the NFL NEtwork was reporting that Vrabel was in KC for a physical)? My best guess is that Pioli is working on a contract extention for Cassel (and the Vrabel in KC thing was not suppose to come out) and that the trade is Vrable, Cassel, and #23 for #3 and #66. This makes sense because the only way they would part with Vrable, is if they knew they had his replacement and that would be Curry at #3.
This makes a ton of sense..