Truth is, we don't know the outcome yet. If the cost is that a thread dies, wahhhhh. Better a couple of internet lawyers (or actual lawyers, on the internet,) explain alternative possibilities and a thread die, than a bunch of internet gnomes play judge and jury with no access even to the facts and circumstances of the case.
I think everybody remembers when the NY Post published these big internet detective pictures with arrows and circles and whatnot superimposed pinning the Marathon bombing on the wrong guys. You want to be the NY Post? I don't.
The null hypothesis is that he's just in the wrong place at the wrong time, here in America.
Don't like it, move to Iran.
All that said, duh, of course it "doesn't look good." But step away from the keyboard for a minute, take a deep breath, and have a little patience for the bad news.
I agree it looks very unlikely that Hernandez isn't involved. And even if he isn't, this story's bad news, not good news. Yay, we all get that. Woo hoo! Bad news!
We just don't know the level of bad news yet.
People who "have seen enough to know" and want to raise that to the level of a virtue deserve a harsh word or two from the rest of us. It's a country of laws, and if we can wait a year and some months to try George Zimmerman, we can wait a few days before we claim to know the outcome of the Hernandez story.