It's either unique, or it's arguable.
It must be "unique" because as B2M has made clear, Belichick is a "fool." It is pretty impressive that a "fool" can also be the greatest. It's definitely "unique."
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's either unique, or it's arguable.
It's incredible how big "our" heads have gotten (some posters at least). It is our crown to lose every year. All these other teams led by dunce coaching staffs and scrub QBs can only hope to ever win it all if we clumsily give away what is rightly ours.
Infreaking credible. The only thing further away from that than reality, is the one game a time philosophy the team was built on.
Your post would make more sense if it weren't for the fact that the Patriots have been the SB favorites for many of the post-2004 seasons. Then again, your post would make more sense if you would act as if you grasp the notion of the best teams needing to win when they're on top.
Put Brady on the Redskins over the past 10 years, and take him off the Patriots, and the Redskins are competing for Lombardis while the Patriots are looking for an RGIII.
The past 8 years has clearly been a waste, from the perspective of what could have been. I'd think acknowledging that would be completely noncontroversial.
It's incredible how poorly some people understand the salary cap.
The Patriots this year signed three young, premier free agents -- Talib, Amendola and Vollmer. They spent pretty good money on each. In the last few years they've extended Gronk, Hernandez, Mayo, Wilfork, Mankins, Gostkowski, and Slater, all to premium contracts. They re-signed their best player this winter, adding three years to Brady's deal.
Teams like Miami that do what you propose, signing those "2-3 impact guys" that will "put them over the top," could only do so after they let their own impact players walk -- in Miami's case, they let go of their their two top offensive players, Jake Long and Reggie Bush, and three of their best defensive players in Sean Smith, Karlos Dansby and Kevin Burnett.
If you want the Patriots to chase players like Mike Wallace or, I don't know, Cliff Avril, you have to be prepared for what that means -- losing players like Vollmer or Talib. Good teams cannot retain all of their own good players and then also add premium free agents. It's simply not possible mathematically. In the best case scenario, a team keeps its own key players and then has to scrape and claw to fill in the gaps with the draft and street free agents.
The Patriots do a great job of keeping all their best young players. It's also good for the clubhouse, where guys see that they will be rewarded before some outsider if they do things right.
Anyway, it's just amazing to me that people don't realize that under the cap, you can't have your cake and eat it, too. You can either have Mike Wallace and lose Vollmer and four other guys, or you can keep all the good players you spent years developing, players you know can keep this team in contention, and then try to spend what little capital's left making (sometimes incremental) improvements. Upgrading the kickoff return from McCourty to Leon Washington for a million bucks is a great example of the kind of move winning teams need to make. Getting Adrian Wilson to cover tight ends instead of Brandon Spikes is another obvious improvement -- he cost one-fifth what Ed Reed cost, is two years younger and was in the Pro Bowl just two years ago. Tommy Kelly on your pass rush instead of Kyle Love -- you preferred Desmond Bryant for $34 million or whatever? Donald Jones as your fifth wideout instead of Deion Branch is probably a net plus. How many teams have a backup swing tackle as good as Will Svitek, a guy who started at left tackle on a playoff team?
All of these things are smart, economical moves. There's probably one or two more moves coming, too -- an Abraham or a Freeney. They're going to spend right to the edge of the cap, and what they don't spend will go to extensions. Exactly what else would you have them do?
What has also been really telling is that those shrieking about the lack of "big moves" have steadfastly refused to say who they should have brought in, at what cost, and who they would have sacrificed to make the moves. instead they just keep repeating cliches like "Wal-Mart shopping" and no "impact players" over and over and over.
Can't help but be reminded of big move impact players like Haynesworth and Ochocinco and the "impact" they had as well as the draft choices they cost.
What has also been really telling is that those shrieking about the lack of "big moves" have steadfastly refused to say who they should have brought in, at what cost, and who they would have sacrificed to make the moves. instead they just keep repeating cliches like "Wal-Mart shopping" and no "impact players" over and over and over.
But they were only 'big moves' to fans who misunderstood them.
Every move has risk. It is kind of disingenuous to look at a very risky move or moves and pretend they were stupid because the risk involved proved true.
Washington was stupid to pay Haynesworth what they did. The Patriots took a reasonable risk that was inexpensive and it didn't work out.
85's play in Cincy was well worth what the Patriots invested in him, and the risk was that outside of that system he would be exposed. The risk was correct, but it is silly to say that anything in 85s career would have been a strong indication that he was that football dumb and his skills had declined so rapidly. The risk was that he was potentially not a good team player. That was not the case here, but the reasons he failed? You would be lying if you said there was a good amount of evidence to predict that.
Your expectations, ignorant of the teams, are what make the moves seem worse than they were.
It's either unique, or it's arguable.
This thread is comedic gold, B2M just called Belichick the greatest coach in the league and a fool in the same frigging breath. It simply doesn't get any dumber than that.
Bill Belichick has managed to keep this team on top for over a decade and has completely rebuilt the entire roster around Brady while never dropping out of contention, and that is a feat. He now has them poised to compete for a Championship for the rest of Brady's career, and while you can never count on winning championships their odds going forward are as good as any team in the league. The spoiled rotten little sh.ts who can't stop whining about not having won it all recently really should take a different approach to football fandom. I would recommend to all of them that in the future they go out and buy the hats and jerseys of the 2 teams in the Super bow each year and throw out the loser's and wear the winners for the next year while shrieking incessantly, "we won, we won, yoooohoooooooooo," because that is clearly the only way they will ever be satisfied.
Belichick takes the same approach that Walsh and Parcells did, by building a team each season that can win their division and make a run for the Lombardi when the play-offs come, and no-one has done that better than he has. And because he has had so much success doing this patriot fans feel each season ending loss acutely, because it almost always comes in the biggest games with the most on the line. Winning it all takes a great team, good health when it matters, a series of really goods play-off performances, and luck, and it cannot be won without all of these coming together, and nothing demonstrated this better than the play-off run by this years Ravens team. And the complete lack of appreciation of the job Belichick is doing year in year out year after year may well be the greatest demonstration of fan ignorance that i have ever witnessed. Everyone wants them to win it all every year that's a given, and losing sucks, but while criticism of certain decisions and moves is always fine because Belichick is not GOD, the whiney crybaby bullsh.t that many in this fanbase demonstrate every offseason is nothing short of unbelievable. What a bunch of idiots.
Great post. Only one small point you forgot:
When you "signing those "2-3 impact guys" that will "put them over the top,"" that also means your depth behind those 2-3 guys is UDFAs or 5-7 rnd picks who you can fit under the tight-cap you are left with. What happens when one or 2 of those 2-3 impact guys gets hurt and goes on IR?? Of course if you can count on the SF 49ers 2012-health-plan; you dont need to worry about that.
Didn't have my sarcasm meter set high enough, Andy. I was addressing those fans in what I wrote. (Not that BB made unwise choices.) They were reasonably low risk deals that didn't pan out as hoped, but their big names somehow smoothed the shreakers that now call for "big names".But they were only 'big moves' to fans who misunderstood them.
Didn't have my sarcasm meter set high enough, Andy. I was addressing those fans in what I wrote. (Not that BB made unwise choices.) They were reasonably low risk deals that didn't pan out as hoped, but their big names somehow smoothed the shreakers that now call for "big names".
Typically those comments are about players such as Wallace, and include 'I wouldn't pay what he got, but why can't we get a top guy'.
Put Brady on the Redskins over the past 10 years, and take him off the Patriots, and the Redskins are competing for Lombardis while the Patriots are looking for an RGIII.
The past 8 years has clearly been a waste, from the perspective of what could have been. I'd think acknowledging that would be completely noncontroversial.
I was reading your post until you fell into the same trap of well Miami did what was proposed, we aren't the Dolphins the situation is totally different.
The salary cap has its limitations but you also should understand that we have the best QB in the league for a reasonable cap hit. It allows you to do more things, which we didn't do this offseason. More could have been done, but instead we get the same kind of JAG FAs ,which is fine but I do not want to hear about how the last 8 years haven't been a failure given this team's unique position in history.
Really? How many franchises in the history of this game arguably had the greatest coach and qb working together at the same time? Not many. You are splitting hairs to downplay the situation with Belichick and Brady to push your agenda.
You are a very confused man, are you still suffering from PTSD after the loss of Welker? Belichick the coach is not the same as Belichick the GM. He can be the greatest coach in the world and also be a foolish GM. If you cannot see that distinction that's fine I wouldn't expect you to since most points fly right over your head. It's hilarious how you have taken your own misunderstanding of the statement and used it to mock me in multiple posts in this thread, it only makes you appear stupider than you are which is an enormous accomplishment.
It is rich that you are act like the only type of fan that can exist is one that accepts losing the same way every year due to mistakes by Belichick the GM