Get out of the heat right now, Sam. Your delusion about the Brady departure is a clear indication of heat stroke. Do you remember at all the Pats cap situation at the end of 2019? Do your remember the roster situation? So let me ask you, Did you think the Pats were just a QB away from a superbowl run in 2020 with the roster we saw that year, even with Brady at QB. And how much worse would it have been if we had spent $25MM on the QB position than than the $1MM we ended up investing. Who else would have had to go?
But you ARE right, Brady had every right to demand $25MM. He was worth it and probably more, but for the Pats in THEIR roster and cap situation it was an untenable position.. One that anyone should have seen. First being Tom Brady, and that is just ONE of the reasons the MYTH that Brady was forced out is so ridiculous.
About the only thing I could complain about Brady's departure was dropping the franchise tag for him. It was probably the right thing to do for a guy who was so important to the franchise, BUT it wasn't the best thing for the team. If they had a franchise threat they probably could have gotten at least a 2nd day pick from whatever team signed him. I don't think they would have played hard ball with him, but at least they could have wound up with something
BTW- Brady, IIRC after he signed his contract in 2011 or 12 was the highest paid QB in the league for several years until Rodgers contract surpassed him. And Brady wasn't lowballed here, there just wasn't the money to pay him unless you FURTHER stripped the roster. Brady never demanded the MOST money, but to keep up the myth that he wasn't paid well is just a lie.
Brady leaving was the inevidible result of a 5 year, all in run that led to 4 superbowls which led to the roster decline, Brady's age and his family situation. The rest was media drama. Even I have to admit it's much juicier story the way you want to tell it.