As I've posted to others and got the response of crickets, where are the metrics? Where is the video? Everyone is repeating the phrase Gilmore sucks (in some form) but in its entirety I've seen one MSM posted video clip of one play that suggests (not factual -- a strong suggestion) Gilmore misread the coverage play.
So I'll buy into Gilmore is the problem when someone can provide some evidence. But evidence is not 'he's new, our pass D is subpar, then it must be Gilmore' (the classic of classic logical fallacies). Further, given there were mixups on coverage with Gilmore out, the same logical fallacy can be applied that the problem isn't Gilmore, no?
Numerously repeating something does not make it true. For those so certain Gilmore has all these negatives, how about at least some sort of compiled 'assignment blown' number? Pass to completion ration on Gilmore's man or area? Some All-22 video of at least a handful of examples showing Gilmore not doing what he needs to do to make the pass coverage competitive?
Seems so simple given all of the 'Gilmore is bad' repeats -- there must be a TON of numbers/examples given the dramatic and absolute statements on Gilmore -- yet nothing posted in the way of facts/metrics.