- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 3,499
- Reaction score
- 7,851
I'd argue (and have) that spending more on the available OTs wouldn't have been any better. That was something that needed to be drafted and wasn't.It worked very well when Brady was here on a below-market contract, veteran free-agents were willing to come and sign for a discount, and the rest of the League hadn't gotten around to using void years and pushing expense into the future relying on an ever-increasing cap.
But this last year? Not so much. What would the year have looked like if they had sprung for a better tackle and paid DHop the extra million he apparently wanted? We had among the worst OLs and receiving corps in the League. Could have been a very different story indeed with some moderately higher spending. Bill the GM got stuck in his old ways and it cost the team (and his job).
While I won't disagree that a better WR would have gotten us further, I don't think we would have been a playoff team. That would have meant we would have spent future cap on a non-playoff team and had less available this year when we need to revamp the entire offense. If that's the way you would prefer the team to run, go ahead, but spending future cap does not guarantee winning. Otherwise the Saints would have more to show for their spending years.