Gumby
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Messages
- 4,575
- Reaction score
- 2,865
So minding my own business and accidently click a BSPN link to a Reiss article and I go, there is no way in hell Reiss gets Michael Floyd's number wrong, directly under a picture of him with the right # (14), and certainly not in THIS WAY.....
I mean it's not like he is confusing numbers with some UDFA or something.
I guess BSPN isn't paying their ghostwriting hacks or editors jack **** either. I feel bad for mike R, I know he normally wouldn't put out crap like this so must be them just using his tag line.
If you want to see yourself before they fix it (if ever), just be warned BSPN link:
http://www.espn.com/blog/new-engla...e-michael-floyd-could-be-squeezed-out-by-pats
. Looks like Floyd has been squeezed out. Wide receiver Michael Floyd (No. 12) might be the receiver most affected by the team's acquisition of Brandin Cooks in a trade. With Julian Edelman, Cooks, Chris Hogan and Malcolm Mitchell atop the depth chart -- and the club holding on to Danny Amendola in a reflection that they hope to work something out to keep him at a reduced salary -- there doesn't appear to be a spot for Floyd at this time. Floyd provided the Patriots with insurance and depth late last season and into the playoffs, but a return in 2017 now looks like a long shot.
I mean it's not like he is confusing numbers with some UDFA or something.
I guess BSPN isn't paying their ghostwriting hacks or editors jack **** either. I feel bad for mike R, I know he normally wouldn't put out crap like this so must be them just using his tag line.
If you want to see yourself before they fix it (if ever), just be warned BSPN link:
http://www.espn.com/blog/new-engla...e-michael-floyd-could-be-squeezed-out-by-pats