Patsfan1958
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 6,430
- Reaction score
- 12,524
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Basically this @Kasmir as me and @1960Pats have been through this once or fifteen timesI truly have no idea what you are really saying. Why are Mahomes, Allen and Herbert scheme specific? Are you truly saying that Herbert is an example of a new breed of QB? I can see that Mahomes and Allen have legs but they both have very strong traditional "pocket" QB skills as well and those will continue to improve and dominate their play as their legs skills fade.
And what part of what you are saying is research and not opinion? The NCAA has always had QB's that relied on legs as well as arms and always will because the legs are always fresh there.
What's really changed? Lamar Jackson? He isn't a trend by himself. The two QB's stylistically most like him last year (Trey Lance and Justin Fields) have so far not produced. Zach Wilson's off platform improvisations have been near disastrous for him. Vince Young failed. Cam Newton and Michael Vick flamed out. Russell Wilson might be fading too.
I get that lots of folks are saying what you're saying, especially emphasizing the importance of "off platform" plays, but that's opinion too, clearly mostly in response to Mahomes's incredible success. Other than echoing those opinions, what actual research supports your claim that pocket QB's are dead?
If you are saying that if Tom Brady was starting his career today he would fail because the game has changed so much, that's crazy. If you are saying he and Peyton Manning wouldn't get a chance today in the NCAA and hence in the NFL because their skills are out of fashion that's very sad if true and hardly anything to crow about. And observing NFL history, all it takes to blow up a foolish fashion trend is contrarian success.
And at the NCAA level, historic recent measurable success by the likes Joe Burrow, Mac Jones and Bailey Zappe is sure to be noticed and nurtured by someone. Even if it's only at the Western Kentucky's.
And none of what I'm saying should be taken to mean that I believe Mac Jones or Bailey Zappe in particular will succeed in the NFL, let alone become superstars. Or that Justin Fields (whom I actually like a lot) and Trey Lance will fail. But if you're betting that no great pocket QB's will ever again emerge and dominate the future NFL, I'll take the other side of that bet and give you odds. It's still freaking football they're playing.
BTW are you predicting that Arch Manning is overhyped and is DOA at Texas?
Nice job man.I think it went something like this:
NCAA HCs were training QB's for years to be pocket passers for the NYFL.
NCAA HCs lost their jobs when that didn't win at the college level.
NCAA HCs started using running QBs more and more.
The NYFL has less pocket passers to choose from and is forced to take in more running QBs.
Lol I ran a poll 3 weeks ago if Mac was the future of the team and the majority voted yes. Here we are today and the majority has voted he isn't even the QB for the season.This poll is embarrassing.
I thought we just established that we were allowed to change our minds??Lol I ran a poll 3 weeks ago if Mac was the future of the team and the majority voted yes. Here we are today and the majority has voted he isn't even the QB for the season.
Everyone is free to change their mind. I just find it funny how quickly we can move on from a guy.I thought we just established that we were allowed to change our minds??
The poll shows that some people on here cannot ignore what they see on the field.This poll is embarrassing.
Its missing fire Patricia.It's missing RLKAG
Not sure why you allow the Brady troll to derail every thread w/ his anti-Brady nonsense. This is a thread specifically about Zappe & Mac, yet here he is again bringing up Brady. WTF.You're killing me with this. Again, I know it's a schtick, and you have fun doing it, but please don't make me go back and dig out all of your posts under your previous username when you gushed over Brady (I was looking at them last week after a similar interaction and sort of shaking my head over it). Because posts like this are 100% the opposite of what you used to post.
But would they give Mac the reigns back for a Road Game against the Jets??85 to 90% is not good enough imo. Let him get to 100% and give him back the reigns if Bill deems that to be best for the team. This MNF game should be a relatively easy win at home against a team with a paltry offense (#31 in points).
Not sure why you allow the Brady troll to derail every thread w/ his anti-Brady nonsense. This is a thread specifically about Zappe & Mac, yet here he is again bringing up Brady. WTF.
What's amusing about this character is him not weighing in on this discussion. We know, despite his Mac10 moniker, that he doesn't think Mac is "the guy." He's gone radio silent on this debate. He's obviously abandoned Mac and spends more time supporting Mahomes as the Goat than discussing Mac on a Patriots forum.
View attachment 46417
Sure, if he's 100% I don't see why not. If they don't then that would be telling.But would they give Mac the reigns back for a Road Game against he Jets??
The poll shows that some people on here cannot ignore what they see on the field.
If Zappe looks really good against Chicago and they win...Bill might stay with the hot hand. IMO that's why they might not.Sure, if he's 100% I don't see why not. If they don't then that would be telling.
This is my thing. If you're going to be a troll at least be good. That guy is just such a knob and he is never subtle or humorous in any of his posts.It's too bad his shtick doesn't include humor or even a hint of wit. Then it might be worth it.
Despite once being his #1 fan (Annie Wilkes reference), he now is in the midst of a 3 year hard on for Brady. I heard a 4 hour hard on was dangerous. This basement virgin needs a release badly.
I really don't understand why this isn't a given...85 to 90% is not good enough imo. Let him get to 100% and give him back the reigns if Bill deems that to be best for the team. This MNF game should be a relatively easy win at home against a team with a paltry offense (#31 in points).
Zappe has been playing above our expectations from Mac. But still, I think that Mac should be brought back as soon as he is at 100%.Zap is playing well enough, and by most accounts, above expectations.