PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Antonio Smith accuses Patriots of spying


Status
Not open for further replies.
Good grief…..18 pages on this? Are WE trying to blow this idiocy up int a huge story or something?

5 pages on my computer.

You can adjust the page/post capacity.

Just sayin'.......
 
So, what is his excuse for his teams other eleventy eleven losses :confused:
 
:spy: Antonio Smith believes the Patriots did something 'fishy' - SBNation.com

Would think we’d beat his 2-9 team by more than 3 points if we were spying…. idiot :der:

A. Smith is spot ON! Nobody knows this yet but Bill Belichick is good friends with Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com. BB has borrowed some of Amazon's unmanned drone package delivery devices, attached a camera and is flying them right into our opponent's practice facility and recording their practices. He purposely doesn't employ this intel until the second half to throw people off the scent. Brilliant! BB beats the system AGAIN!!

Antonio Smith should be fined for STUPIDITY!!
 
Sorry folks, but I'm so sick of the legacy of Spygate. Just when you think it's a "thing" of the past, some idiot like this (or idiotic fans of other teams) accuse the Pats of cheating and it opens up that wound again. The Pats just can't win--it's never going to end. No matter what anyone does or says or how many games the Pats win in the future, this ***** will always be brought up. (Now, a couple more Lombardis while Brady/BB are still here would sure help ME, but still would do nothing to shut up these ignoramuses).

I know that it's a twisted form of flattery that Spygate will be used against the team and it's coach until the end of time--a convenient shortcut for the haters to use when their teams' accomplishments look puny in comparison to ours. And the Pats will just go about their business as they always do, using this kind of stuff as bulletin board material when they see fit. But I am frustrated as hell and need to vent. The worse part is this wouldn't even really be an issue for me had the Pats not gotten blatantly cheated by the refs in Carolina--otherwise we're in the AFC driver's seat and wouldn't have to worry about teams like Indy or Cincy taking the bye away from this beat up team.
 
But wait, there's more!

Rich Eisen ✔ @richeisen
Steelers Ryan Clark on NFL's investigation of Tomlin's sideline two-step: "There will be no tapes to burn so it should be a speedy process."

Hey Ryan, how did that 50-burger taste a few weeks ago, you over-the-hill bum?
 
Holy crap, my username still works and I remembered it and the password?!

Please Pats fans, pay no attention to Antonio's comments and believe me that no sane Texans fan believes that you had to do anything besides show up to beat us yesterday, much less resort to cheating to move down the field against our garbage defense.

By the way, Antonio is a pretty good player but I've seen a lot of people not knowing who he is- he's the guy who took Incognito's hat off and tried to bash him in the face with it this preseason.

Good luck the rest of the way guys, I'm rooting for the Pats because y'all have great fans and an even more awesome team.
 
I will hate the Jets franchise till the day I leave this earth.

The scandal was no scandal at all.

Covert down, distance and play selection data collection had been done for years. The reason it got swept under the rug by the NFL was because if they had they pursued it aggressively, it would've opened up a huge can of worms. Exposing numerous "methods" teams used in order to collect data.

The Jets reasons for creating the controversy were to destroy the Patriots legacy and more importantly destroy Belichick.

It was as scumbag a move as the league had ever seen.

Happily....Karma is a great equalizer. The Jets will always be second fiddle to an admirable Giants franchise and joke of the NFL. The NFL version of the LA Clippers.
 
Unless Antonio Smith has evidence the NFL has no plans to investigate his accusation.

The Blitz with Jeff Howe & Karen Guregian | Boston Herald



This is where I think the Patriots should put out a statement putting it back on Antonio Smith. If I was them I would even float the idea of a lawsuit in said statement.
 
Having now listened to the Smith comments a bunch of times, I'm more convinced that he was taking a shot as his team than I am that he was actually accusing the Patriots of malfeasance.
 
Curran just now on Comcast said he intends to ask Smith and/or the Texans this week for evidence to support his suggestion/accusation that NE spied/cheated. He suggested that if Smith can't produce evidence, he should be subject to some sort of league discipline. Interesting.
 
GOTTA LOVE BB.


He gets THE QUESTION that everybody knows is coming and he gives the answer that everyone knows is coming, 'yeah league matter.' (F You, you mediot can't think up a good question piece of s.)


Then, 5-6 questions later.... BB REALLY ANSWERS THE QUESTION.
normally he wouldnt do this unless the question was really good; but BB obviously wanted to slam Antonio; so he just takes off on this "regular personnel " question (so-so good ?) and gives his patented history lesson of the league type response.....



HERE YOU GO MR. SMITH..... HERE IS HOW WE FIGURED YOU OUT YOU DUMB AZZ. Now go back to school little boy and I'll give you your ball back at recess but only if you ask and say "please".







Belichick was also asked whether he read the comments of Houston defensive lineman Antonio Smith, who was very suspicious of the adjustments the Patriots made to Houston’s defense after trailing at halftime Sunday, 17-7.


“Yeah, I saw them. I don’t have any comment on them. I think that’s a league matter,” Belichick said.

......
....
Q: In the second half, you used a lot more ‘regular personnel’ with the fullback, running back, tight end and two receivers. What prompted that move, as it was more frequent that we were accustomed to and what did it allow you to do?

BB: As the game went on, we were able to see how Houston was going to match up to our different personnel groups and we had several groups that we used yesterday. I think Josh [McDaniels] did a good job of mixing the groups. Let’s say defensively when you’re facing a team that uses a lot of personnel groups, it’s hard to have a lot of things ready for a lot of different groups. It’s just hard to have a game plan where you have eight or nine different calls against seven, eight groups. You just run out of time to practice it and time to work on it. So, I think Josh was able to get a good handle on how they were matching our different personnel groups and what they were trying to do against them. When you get it down to two or three things and Tom [Brady] can recognize by formations what the defenses are, that can get you into a good play or give you a quick indication of where to go with the ball, so we didn’t have to hold it, we could get it out there quick and find the receivers that had the best matchups. Again, kind of a combination of all those factors. The different personnel groups I think ended up being helpful for us in terms of getting good plays, or plays that we felt comfortable with, matched up against what the Texans were doing.


Q: How difficult is it for a defense to deal with the different skill sets of your running backs and not knowing who will be the feature back from game to game?


BB: I think we’ve seen that from different teams over the past few years. It’s kind of interesting how, again, and Houston is a good example but we saw with Denver, we saw with other teams that try to match you on defense, sometimes it takes a little while to figure out how they’re going to match you. It’s a lot easier when you go to three receivers, one tight end and a back to get that matchup. It’s the ones in-between where there are two tight ends and who is the back and we’ve found in years past and even this year, sometimes a team would match a sub defense against a certain player. It could be a back, it could be [Danny] Woodhead or [Kevin] Faulk or [Shane] Vereen. It didn’t matter who else was in the game. Sometimes they would match it based on what combination of tight ends were in there. When you’re shuffling a lot of people in and out, it’s hard to, I think, defensively it’s hard to get it all figured out. Sometimes that why I’m saying it’s just predicated on one guy. Like going back, there were times when teams, as soon as they saw Kevin Faulk come in the game, they would go sub just in anticipation of whoever the other people were, it was more of a passing-type of down. Then hopefully when you see that, you would try to put him in there with a group that you feel like could give you a good running matchup against a team. We hit a couple sub runs on Houston yesterday in that situation. Again, that’s a little bit of a chess game sometimes. If a team is trying to match you, what’s triggering the match? Is it a certain guy? Is it multiple receivers? Will they match multiple tight ends if a certain tight end is the trigger guy? Is it a guy? Sometimes it’s just down and distance. Sometimes you’ll see a team that will just send their sub group on there if it’s second-and-8, it doesn’t matter who you have in the game. Sometimes figuring that out, when you use different personnel groups offensively, takes a little bit. Shane’s a guy that dependent on how a team feels about their coverage situation, he may or may not dictate a matchup. It’s something that we’re aware of, but we don’t know how everybody is going to treat us until we actually get in the game and play them.
 
But wait, there's more!



Hey Ryan, how did that 50-burger taste a few weeks ago, you over-the-hill bum?

As a tribute to Clark's comments, I think I'll go watch Tebow throw a TD pass to Demaryius Thomas in the playoffs again and laugh.
 
But wait, there's more!



Hey Ryan, how did that 50-burger taste a few weeks ago, you over-the-hill bum?

Probably not as good as the one he will be having at the turn during his first round of golf in early January.


I actually hope i am wrong, i hope the Steelers make the play-offs and the Patriots get to paste them, that would be so much more fun and very few teams concern me less.
 
By the way, Antonio is a pretty good player but I've seen a lot of people not knowing who he is- he's the guy who took Incognito's hat off and tried to bash him in the face with it this preseason.

Were you going for redemption or ridicule with that fact?

I actually like Smith more now. With or without the Martin incident, you can't lose with that decision.
 
The idiots who post on the NFL website are saying they believe it because "once a cheater always a cheater." I'm sure plenty of haters are going to come out and claim the Patriots are guilty even if there is no evidence to support it. Six years later and people are still talking about it. This story has not died because so many Patriots haters have tried to keep it going. There are some very bitter fans and players out there, and media members who are playing to that audience. All the haters do is look for excuses like spygate, tuck rule, and so on. It's not possible that the Patriots win because they are good. It would be absurd to even consider such a thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Patriots QB Drake Maye Conference Call
Patriots Now Have to Get to Work After Taking Maye
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf and Jerod Mayo After Patriots Take Drake Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Back
Top