- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 13,687
- Reaction score
- 16,178
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Sincere question: why isn't everyone going nuts that Edelman seems to have made the team?? I thought he was the Binky of Binkies.
Sincere question: why isn't everyone going nuts that Edelman seems to have made the team?? I thought he was the Binky of Binkies.
Even the Superior Intellects agreed that he would make the team, so the gloating on the one side and sour grapes on the other is long past.
Also, I thought there were a lot of anti-Woods people on here and he made the team without any noise.
QB (2): Brady, Hoyer
RB (5): Maroney, F. Taylor, Morris, Faulk, Green-Ellis
WR (6): Moss, Welker, Galloway, Aiken, Edelman, Lewis
TE (3): Watson, Baker, Matthews
OL (9): Light, Mankins, Koppen, Neal, Kaczur, Connolly, Ohrnberger, Vollmer, Wendell
DL (7):Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, Brace, Pryor, Green, Wright
DE/OLB (3) : Burgess, Banta-Cain, Ninkovich
LB (5): Alexander, Guyton, Mayo, Thomas, Woods
S (5): Meriweather, Sanders, Chung, McGowan, Slater
CB (5): Bodden, Butler, Springs, Wheatley, Wilhite
ST (3): Gostkowski, Hanson, Ingram
PUP: Tate
IR: Bussey, McKenzie, C. Taylor, Crable
Hmmm, carrying only 2 QBs comes as a bit of a surprise to me, and I’m very surprised that they went with 5 RB (with none able to play the Evans role), as well as both Connolly and Wendell. Wouldn’t be shocked if we see Morris, BJGE, Wendell or Connolly go in the next couple days, to make room for a QB. Is Matthews our fullback now, too? If this is the roster that we head into the season with, though, then I’m down with that.
My binkies were Ninkovich and McGowan, so I’m def. happy about that, plus glad to see Slater make the roster even with the injury.
Interesting group of guys on paper. Some youth on defense and some good experience along the lines of scrimmage.
I don't see why BJGE is the first guy that would be cut, we have 6 WRs and if Welker and Edelman are healthy and Galloway shows he is fitting in than that position could easily be raided to make room for a veteran OL, also Ninkovich and McGowan are probably close to the bubble. BJGE might have shown enough that we would rather keep him than lose him to another team.
I really hope our top three linebackers stay healthy.
If Brady and Moss and Welker stay healthy the team is automatically dangerous and those youngsters on defense will come along as the season progresses.
We are loaded at many positions. This could turn out to be a scary team.
Interesting group of guys on paper. Some youth on defense and some good experience along the lines of scrimmage.
I don't see why BJGE is the first guy that would be cut, we have 6 WRs and if Welker and Edelman are healthy and Galloway shows he is fitting in than that position could easily be raided to make room for a veteran OL, also Ninkovich and McGowan are probably close to the bubble. BJGE might have shown enough that we would rather keep him than lose him to another team.
I really hope our top three linebackers stay healthy.
If Brady and Moss and Welker stay healthy the team is automatically dangerous and those youngsters on defense will come along as the season progresses.
We are loaded at many positions. This could turn out to be a scary team.
Interesting group of guys on paper. Some youth on defense and some good experience along the lines of scrimmage.
I don't see why BJGE is the first guy that would be cut, we have 6 WRs and if Welker and Edelman are healthy and Galloway shows he is fitting in than that position could easily be raided to make room for a veteran OL, also Ninkovich and McGowan are probably close to the bubble. BJGE might have shown enough that we would rather keep him than lose him to another team.
I really hope our top three linebackers stay healthy.
If Brady and Moss and Welker stay healthy the team is automatically dangerous and those youngsters on defense will come along as the season progresses.
We are loaded at many positions. This could turn out to be a scary team.
Posting incorrect predictions in your signature is cool.
Posting incorrect predictions in your signature is cool.
No way B.McGowan is on the bubble.
As proved in yesterday's thread, many think he's the first one in if either Meriweather or Sanders get hurt--depending on Springs' situation of course. He's certainly ahead of Chung in the base defense so far, anyway. Although I expect Chung to gradually be played in nickel/dime situations throughout the year--and/or get some garbage time reps in the 2nd half. Regardless, he won't be starting right away if one of our safeties go down. IMO, the Springs factor is yet to be determined here, but at any rate--McGowan got off the bubble at least 2-3 weeks ago. He has ST value, and can tackle very well, not to mention he does have 'some' veteran presence.
Edit: sorry DaBruinz--was typing as you pretty much posted the same thing
Ninkovitch beat out Crable, pure and simple.
Pray tell, what exactly is incorrect?
Not that I think I think Lawfirm will be cut or anything (especially since we haven't signed a back-up QB after cutting Walter), but what are you going to say if Lawfirm DOES get cut? After all, there are still six more cuts to be made.
He won't say anything, but someone will take his sig and make it their sig, making it a double-burn.
Posting incorrect predictions in your signature is cool.
Do we really need to rake posters over the coals multiple times for the same statement?
So does your sig count as a quadruple burn?