No, it just seems like you are naive in that you think teams will replicate the scheme of hitting Brady time and time again.
It's just silly to think that teams are just going to to replicate the Giants effectiveness, because they do not have a slew of athletic pass rushers and or have a personnel that matches up just right with the Patriots' offense. If I had a dime for every time I heard some "genius" proclaim the way to beat a team is to get to their quarterback, I sure would be rich. What do we always say is the way to beat our opponent? What have other fanbases been saying about Brady, and every other quarterback in the NFL, since the beginning of the modern passing era?
You beat a team by getting to the quarterback.
So, you are really brilliant to come up with awesome gameplan, and I'm sure the Patriots are in big trouble, because this is the first time I've ever heard that it's important for teams to put pressure on Brady. What do you think defensive coordinators are thinking about ALL offseason and weeks up to the game? Coverages that allow Brady to sit in the pocket for five seconds before giving up and throwing the ball away?
The Giants went 8-0 in the playoffs during their two SB runs, and they beat some pretty darn good QBs (on the road) in the process. The problems the Giants pose are not just problems for the Patriots.
But even our biggest nemesis needed a couple of breaks to beat us in the final minute. This isn't an excuse, it's just a fact. This isn't like we got whitewashed 38-0 because our scheme was exposed; we could have put the Giants away with one play in both of our losses to them.