Almost as hilarious as you assuming you know the motivation of why people are posting about a topic.
An illustration of the absurdity of the human condition. If someone is intolerant of something, we castigate him/her. But in doing so, we're being intolerant of them. So intolerance is not acceptable, but intolerance of intolerance is? If so, why?
What if people who dislike gays (or the gay lifestyle) have such an intense cognitive disagreement with the concept, that it makes them really truly uncomfortable? And the fact that everyone else translates that as bigotry only makes it worse for them, because it intensifies their cognitive dissonance? In such a scenario, is it fair to keep forcing such people to change their mindset, if they're not directly hurting anyone due to their beliefs?
Not taking a stand on the position of any poster in this thread. I'm just saying what's "right" is rarely ever that easily discernible, no matter how convinced you might be that you're right (so is the other fella, and that after all is the root of all conflict, isn't it?).
So why am I pointing this out? Because, A) I get a kick out of acknowledging how chaotic real life really is, and B) realization of that fact should lend oneself to be a little more humble concerning what you think is really truly right, damn whatever someone else may think.