Disagree.
it is not a wise course of action to keep Corky around.
it costs too much. it costs a roster slot. worse, it costs accountability.
It keeps an incompetent loser around, providing a toxic example of poor performance being tolerated in the locker room.
we cannot afford to wait to get rid of such egregious repeat offenses.
1) OK: let's see why.
2. Again, let's see if we see
why it is not a a"wise course of action."
3. The notion that Mac, with all his faults, which I acknowledge, given particularly that he is as of now, according to the evaluation of any expert I have heard, the best qb presently on the roster, there is little (I would say NO) prospect that the last man on the roster would be less valuable than Mac would, so there is no loss in the overall quality of the roster by keeping him. If the past is the best evidence for the future, and it is, then that "last man" would almost certainly be some long shot unlikely ever to see a single meaningful snap the whole year long. Should that change, we could have a different discussion, but as of now, this is obviously the case. As for money, until there is a draftee (when, again we could have a different conversation,) Mac's cost would not at all be out of line with the most likely alternative, an experienced vet. I see no merit in your cost argument. An argument could be made that the vet would be better for any new qb prospect. That would be a reasonable argument, but that is not the argument you offer.
4. "It costs accountability." Thus is a purely theoretical speculation. You'd have to explain why the example of a player who performed badly, who was benched and is now facing, at maybe 50/50 odds, likely removal from the team, and who has been subject to public humiliation would exemplify lack of accountability. It does not. Along these lines, FAR more damage was done by FAILING to reward Jakobi Meyers for all to see, demonstrating that skill, commitment, hard work and improvement are of no interest to this team, or at least not to its failed GM/FC. Now THAT did real damage.
5)The idea that Mac's mere presence is going to poison somebody emotionally or something is ridiculous, an insult to the men involved. Do you really think they are so weak that they'll go into some sort of emotional swandive because some guy had a bad year? Ridiculous. They ain't that weak.
I expect Mac will likely be gone at some point before the end of next year, say. We are at
this time under absolutely zero compulsion to make a change re Mac. There is simply no reason to act at this time. I don't understand your breathless urgency on the matter. Do you just hate the guy? If so why: does anyone who fails at a task in life deserve such derision? Let he who is without failure cast the first stone.